Ahead of the curve: Turning upcoming regulatory challenges into advantages

Thanks to our advertisers
Thanks to our advertisers
Andrew Wolch

Managing Director, Toronto, PMP Strategy

Contributing expert

Expert corner

Ahead of the curve: Turning upcoming regulatory challenges into advantages

Published on May 2, 2025

Canada’s auto insurance industry is entering a period of significant transformation, driven by regulatory reforms in Ontario and Alberta—two of the country’s largest private auto insurance markets. Both provinces are implementing substantial changes with overlapping timelines, aiming to address challenges such as high premiums, limited consumer choice, and overall market efficiency.

While these reforms present operational challenges, they also offer strategic opportunities for insurers to innovate, enhance customer-centricity, and gain a competitive edge, by responding more effectively than the competition. This article examines the regulatory landscape, explores strategic implications, and provides concrete actions insurers can take to navigate this evolving environment and drive business success.

Overview of regulatory reforms

Ontario and Alberta are pursuing different regulatory paths to modernize their auto insurance systems:

  • Ontario’s Approach: Enhancing consumer choice by introducing greater flexibility within a mandatory coverage framework. This includes optional income replacement benefits and customizable accident benefits, empowering consumers to select coverage that better aligns with their individual needs. These changes are slated to take effect on July 1, 2026.
  • Alberta’s Approach: Prioritizing cost stabilization and market sustainability by shifting to a no-fault model, capping minor injury claims, and revising accident benefits. These measures aim to reduce litigation costs and provide more predictable premiums. The changes are expected to be implemented in January 2027, just six months after Ontario’s updates.

While both provinces aim to improve affordability and consumer experience, their divergent approaches require insurers to adapt both strategically and operationally in each market. Insurers must ensure compliance while leveraging these changes to differentiate and target key segments more effectively.

Ontario: Customization within a mandatory framework

Ontario’s regulatory reforms aim to empower consumers with more flexible coverage options, allowing them to tailor accident benefits to better match their financial resilience and risk tolerance. This shift presents insurers with opportunities to innovate in product design and customer engagement.

Positioning for success in Ontario – Three practical focus areas

1- Enhancing focus on consumer-centric products

  • Introduce modular policy structures that let consumers adjust key coverage components such as income replacement and medical benefits. While insurers currently offer limited options, the proposed modular approach will provide significantly greater flexibility. Insurers who are working on new predefined packages will help consumers better understand and select the coverage that best suits their needs. 
  • Develop digital self-serve platforms where customers and brokers can customize coverage and instantly see the premium impact.
  • Test consumer response through A/B testing of different product designs to optimize uptake and customer satisfaction. Insurers using this approach will capture the opportunity to leverage modern business platforms to test and refine offerings at a lower cost, while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.

Example: An insurer could offer a tiered income replacement benefit with options of 60%, 75%, and 90%, allowing consumers to select based on their financial situation while showing tangible implications of different claims scenarios.

2- Leverage advanced analytics for precision targeting and pricing

  • Use machine learning to further segment customers based on driving habits, vehicle type, and personal risk factors to offer tailored pricing. The detailed behavioral insights telematics provide can create a significant competitive advantage if used effectively as there are few insurers that are maximizing the value of this rich data.
  • Build predictive models to identify which customers will benefit most from specific policy options and proactively offer recommendations. This creates an opportunity for insurers to attract preferred consumers at the top of the sales funnel and increase bind rates through advanced modeling capabilities for both marketing and pricing optimization

Example: By analyzing telematics data, an insurer could confirm that younger drivers tend to opt for lower income replacement but higher accident benefits, adjusting marketing and product offerings accordingly.

While real-time rate adjustments are still a ways away in Ontario, insurers can use these insights to refine future rate filings and product structures, ensuring alignment with evolving customer needs and market conditions, while immediately improving customer targeting.

3- Strengthen trust through advisory services

  • Train brokers and agents to provide decision-support tools that simulate different policy scenarios. Regulatory changes make this challenge more complex, emphasizing the importance of their role in providing sound advice and support, and some insurers will see that as an opportunity to strengthen ties with their broker partners.
  • Develop customer education programs that clarify the benefits and trade-offs of different coverage options. This can be achieved using simulators, similar to those used in pension savings. 
  • Incentivize brokers to offer personalized recommendations aligned with consumer risk profiles. This approach not only strengthens relationships with brokers but also supports growth.

Example: A broker could utilize a decision-tree tool to help customers understand how product variables impact premium savings while also aiding brokers in navigating the variability present in each insurer's product offerings.

Alberta: Cost stabilization and operational efficiency

Alberta’s shift toward a no-fault model and cost containment measures aims to reduce litigation expenses and stabilize premiums. This presents a strategic opportunity for insurers to optimize operational efficiency and product delivery.

Positioning for success in Alberta – Three practical focus areas

1- Streamline claims processing and cost efficiency

  • Automate claims handling for minor injuries using artificial intelligence (AI)-based triage systems. Many insurers have already developed such use cases in claims, especially with car damage, with additional solutions available from Insurtech platforms. Adapting to a no-fault model will require new processes and the ability to uncover inefficiencies within the new framework.
  • Centralize claims management for consistency and faster resolution. This approach allows insurers to evolve the operating model by incorporating centralization and specialization, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and enhancing outcomes. 
  • Partner with healthcare providers to offer direct payment models and reduce administrative overhead.

Example: An insurer could introduce a claims chatbot that guides customers through the process, automatically authorizing minor repairs up to a defined threshold. Alternatively, they could leverage their app used for First Notice of Loss (FNOL) to streamline the experience.

2- Capitalize on existing capabilities

  • Benchmark operational models from other no-fault markets to accelerate adaptation. Insurers already using this model, such as those in Quebec, will be able to adjust their practices more swiftly.
  • Crosstrain claims staff on new no-fault handling procedures ahead of the implementation date. Several insurers have already developed this ability to align the approach to compensation with the approach to sales and underwriting, to offer a coherent customer journey.
  • Develop partnerships with rehabilitation clinics to offer preferred pricing and streamlined care coordination.

Example: An insurer operating across Canada could apply lessons from handling soft-tissue injury claims to improve Alberta’s operational efficiency to resolve injury claims quicker, while delivering better outcomes for the injured parties.

3- Drive proactive cost containment

  • Enhance fraud detection by expanding the use of models that incorporate anomaly detection and network analysis.
  • Deepen use of and collaboration with telematics platforms to monitor and discourage risky driving behavior.
  • Strengthen ties with and encourage use of preferred repair shop networks with negotiated pricing and performance incentives. 

Example: An insurer could flag and investigate claims where injury severity is inconsistent with telematics data, reducing fraudulent payouts.

Navigating the dual-jurisdictional strain operationally  

As insurers face the ongoing dual-jurisdictional challenges of navigating regulatory changes in both Ontario and Alberta, now is the optimal time to consider undertaking an operational review of how regulatory challenges are managed enterprise-wide. While insurers have always gotten by and managed regulatory change, there is no question that it creates an operational burden on the organization.

By aligning people, processes, technology, and governance, insurers can build a more effective and efficient organization capable of managing regulatory change and compliance across multiple jurisdictions. In doing so, some insurers are increasing their ability to remain agile, responsive, and compliant with evolving regulations while minimizing organizational disruption on more strategic and ‘business as usual’ activity.

  1. People: Building a cross-functional regulatory compliance team

The first pillar of successful operation is ensuring that the right talent and organizational structure are in place. The workforce must be equipped not only with the necessary skills but also with a deep understanding of the regulatory landscapes in multiple provinces.

Because experienced talent with this mix of skills is scarce, insurers must invest in targeted recruitment, offer competitive compensation, and develop in-house training programs to build expertise. It’s also important to decide whether to centralize regulatory expertise in one team for consistency or decentralize it across provinces to stay closer to local market needs.

  1. Process: Streamlining and standardizing regulatory compliance

Regulatory changes create additional work and can quickly strain capacity, making it an ideal time to reassess and improve operational processes. In regions like Ontario and Alberta, capacity is consumed through product redesign and communication challenges. To maintain efficiency, workflows must be streamlined and adaptable across different jurisdictions and integrated with the core business.

A thoughtful review can identify bottlenecks, eliminate redundancies, and free up capacity through automation, standardized templates, or thoughtful consideration of centralized vs. decentralized resources. By addressing these challenges, regulatory changes become less burdensome, allowing the organization to continue with strategic initiatives that are often deferred due to regulatory demands. 

  1. Technology: Enabling regulatory excellence through technology

Leveraging the right technology is essential to ensure insurers stay compliant and agile as regulations evolve, while also providing the best experience to brokers, agents and those insured. By utilizing integrated platforms and data-driven tools, insurers can enhance both regulatory outcomes and operational efficiency, while enabling continued investment in digital initiatives. 

  1. Governance: Strengthening oversight and accountability

Effective governance structures are essential for ensuring that the organization stays aligned with regulatory requirements and can quickly respond to changes. This includes setting clear accountability and decision-making frameworks. To transform regulatory changes into a genuine opportunity for the business, governance must balance compliance, customer experience and financial performance.

By aligning people, processes, technology, and governance to create a more agile and efficient organization, insurers will not only streamline regulatory compliance efforts but will also position the organization to thrive in an evolving and demanding regulatory landscape.

Conclusion: Embracing change as a path to leadership

The regulatory changes in Ontario and Alberta mark a potentially transformative period for Canada’s auto insurance industry. These reforms introduce complexities and operational challenges—but also create opportunities for strategic differentiation and growth.

Insurers who proactively adapt—through consumer-centric products, precision targeting and pricing, operational efficiency, and enhanced advisory roles—will be well positioned to lead in a competitive market.

By treating regulatory changes as catalysts for innovation and operational excellence, insurers can build sustainable competitive advantages. In an environment where adaptability and customer-centricity are key differentiators, those who navigate this evolving landscape strategically will secure long-term success in Canada’s auto insurance market.

This article was written in collaboration with Philippe Frizon, Associate Partner at PMP Strategy (Montreal), and Eric Panet-Raymond, Partner at PMP Strategy Canada. 

Thanks to our advertisers
Thanks to our advertisers