Firm’s failure to respond to complaint investigation results in civil penalty

Visibility360, PDF version to share

By Kate McCaffery | March 1, 2022, 10:20 a.m.

Its designated representative failed to respond to a formal demand for information when the agency was being investigated over a complaint made about the agency.

This article is reserved to PRO Level subscribers

Discover the PRO Level

The most popular in Life Insurance

Pension risk transfer market volumes in 2023 match record

Whole life sales drove growth in the life insurance market in 2023

Defined benefit pension funding increases in the first quarter of 2024

Make your business shine with Visibility360!

Get a PDF version to share in your networks.

I'm interested

Headlines

Quebec flood zone map raises concerns even before its release

Tips for increasing your firm’s value

Agent who defrauded retired couple banned from securities registration

Related topics …

Flash

Quebec flood zone map raises concerns even before its release

Tips for increasing your firm’s value

Ontario regulator publishes guidance for comment

Insurers pushing their limits in accelerated underwriting

ALBERTA INSURANCE COUNCIL (AIC)

Regulator sanctions agents who failed to respond to demand for information

Agent in the industry one year fined $1,000 for not cooperating with regulator

Regulator levies additional sanctions in case where advisors falsified information

Alberta Insurance Council orders $145,000 civil penalty

Disciplinary Decisions

Agent who defrauded retired couple banned from securities registration

Agency fined $20,000 for repeatedly allowing unlicensed activity

Mutual fund rep fined close to $1.7-million

Missing continuing education, lapsed liability insurance nets $4,000 fine